|
MSU scientists Betsey Pitts
and Phil Stewart are coauthors on a paper on bacterial resistance to
antibiotics published in the Nov. 20 issue of the prestigious journal
Nature.
Antibiotics don't work against bacteria stuck together in tight-knit
communities called biofilms. That much scientists knew.
But just why biofilm bacteria act that
way whereas other bacteria do not has puzzled researchers for years
and made the control of biofilm infections much more difficult. |
Now scientists at Montana State
University-Bozeman and two other universities believe they have part
of the answer: genetics. Bacteria turn on different genes when they
form biofilms, and one characteristic of that particular genetic
expression is a resistance to antibiotics.
The researchers' findings appear
in the Nov. 20 issue of the prestigious journal Nature.
"One of the most vexing problems in
biofilms is that when microbes band together in a biofilm they are
remarkably protected from killing by antibiotics, biocides and
disinfectants," said Phil Stewart, deputy director of the Center for
Biofilm Engineering at MSU-Bozeman and study co-author. "And of course
we'd like an explanation for that."
For years scientists intuitively thought that the
bacterial clusters created a physical barrier that prohibited
the antibiotics from getting through. But in aproject
led by researchers George O'Toole |
 |
MSU scientists Betsey Pitts and Phil
Stewart
MSU photo by Stephen Hunt |
and Thien-Fah Mah at Dartmouth Medical
School, the scientists showed that the antibiotics do penetrate the
biofilm. But they don't kill the bacteria.
The scientists worked with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a biofilm-forming bacterium that's one of the biggest
troublemakers in cystic fibrosis lung infections, burn wound
infections and infections associated with the use of catheters. It and
other biofilm bacteria can become from 10 to 1,000 times more
resistant to antibiotics than non biofilm bacteria.
The scientists traced this resistance
to one gene--called ndvB--that switches on in a biofilm and protects
the bacteria from dying. It's likely that ndvB isn't the only gene
involved, Stewart said, but its discovery tells scientists that
additional genetic studies of biofilm bacteria may yield even more
surprises.
“This is the first time anyone has used
an unbiased genetic approach to understand why biofilms are resistant
to antibiotics,” said lead author Mah, a postdoctoral fellow at
Dartmouth Medical School.
Biofilms are thought to cause up to 65
percent of human bacterial infections, according to the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention. The communities form on medical
implants, teeth (plaque), internal organs and in the middle ear where
they cause childhood ear infections. Biofilms also can form in
industrial settings such as oil pipelines and in municipal water
plants and pipes.
Now scientists can envision drugs that
potentially interfere with the expression of specific genes in
bacteria or with the proteins those genes make as a way of treating
biofilm infections.
"A gene is a very powerful, concrete
handhold on a problem, and this is one of the first examples of
biofilm protection occurring at the genetic level," Stewart said.
The Nature study also involved MSU
research scientist Betsey Pitts and two biologists from MIT. Funding
came from a variety of federal agencies, including the National
Science Foundation through its long-term support of the MSU Center for
Biofilm Engineering, the world's largest group devoted to biofilm
research, Stewart said.
Contact: Dr. Phil Stewart
phil_s@erc.montana.edu
406 994-2890
Montana State University News
|